2024年2月15日 星期四

"Redshirts" by John Scalzi (2012)


"'Yes, and I have training dealing with deep, existential questions,' Dahl said, 'The way I'm dealing with it right now is this: I don't care whether I really exist or don't, whether I'm real or fictional.  What I want right now is to be the person who decides my own fate.  That's something I can work on.  It's what I'm working on now.'"

John Scalzi is a science fiction writer living in California.  He's known for both his novels and his blog Whatever, which delves into a variety of topics.

This is the first of his novels that I've read, though I've heard his name mentioned for many years now.  He seems to have a very loyal following, and after reading Redshirts I can understand why.

In Redshirts several "extras" living out a television show come to grips with the fact that the situations in which they find themselves aren't as authentic as they once assumed, and as they delve deeper into their predicament they become aware of a much larger reality beyond the confines of their starship.

Highlighting this narrative is the author's sense of humor.  Imagine Philip K. Dick, for example, getting "recursive and meta" (to use Scalze's words), but instead of retreating into his usual hopelessness and paranoia PKD stops to crack a joke.  This ability to poke fun at his characters while telling challenging stories is what sets Scalze apart from many other writers.

My only complaint is the three "extra chapters" tacked on to the end of this book.  In my opinion these "codas" were completely unnecessary, and their more serious tone brought down what was otherwise a fun little jaunt through a universe not too far removed from Star Trek.  These extra chapters seem more like unsuccessful attempts at the original novel, and while two of the three would work well as short stories, they're really too different in tone to bear inclusion alongside Redshirts, the main narrative.

I look forward to reading more of Scalzi's books in the future.  I haven't seen any in the bookstores I frequent, but perhaps I'll stumble across something by him in the summer.

Related Entries:

2024年2月8日 星期四

"The Ministry for the Future" by Kim Stanley Robinson (2020)


"If I could get policymakers, and citizens, everywhere to read just one book this year, it would be Kim Stanley Robinson's The Ministry for the Future."

--Ezra Klein, Vox

But why?  What are these policymakers and citizens supposed to get out of this book?  Does it offer any realistic solutions to the problem of climate change?  None that I could see...

"Masterly."

--New Yorker

Agree to disagree?  I think that in terms of story and characterization this book is an abysmal failure.

"Robinson is the SF writer of my lifetime, and this stands as some of his best work.  It's my book of the year."

--Locus

Nope.  There are much better SF writers out there.  This also isn't even close to Robinson's best work.  2312 was much better, and even Green Mars, which I also read a while back, was more interesting.

"A breathtaking look at the challenges that face our planet in all their sprawling magnitude and also in their intimate, individual moments of humanity."

--Booklist

If you ask me, "humanity" is exactly what's missing from large swathes of this book.  The chapters near the beginning and end have some dramatic impact, but everything between them consists of a long, tiresome lecture on climate change which adjoins a series of impractical solutions to this problem, none of which are explained to anyone's satisfaction.  Given the time scale involved, this novel is even more fantastical than books dealing with the terraforming of Mars, human reactions to a "first contact," or any number of other science fiction tropes.

"The Ministry for the Future serves as a blueprint for how we can throw climate change into reverse and actually reverse the amount of carbon in the atmosphere over the next three decades."

--Mashable

Really?  I'm not seeing much of a "blueprint" here.  What I'm seeing instead is a series of increasingly impractical ideas that are never explained in full.  If you'll excuse the pun, the author is on firmer ground when it comes to "geoengineering," but some of the chapters offering economic solutions to the climate change problem are downright laughable.  

Most galling of all is the author's dismissal of the online architecture in which many of us function.  It's like he's never heard of Google and the other corporations who hold so much sway over modern life, not to mention the ease with which this "Ministry for the Future" renders something like Facebook obsolete.  Does he really think that the rest of us haven't heard of blockchain?  Or end-to-end encryption?

... anyway, by now you're well aware that I didn't like this book.  It's long-winded, it's extremely pretentious (in particular the "riddle" chapters), and in narrative terms it's a mess.  Perhaps most infuriating of all is the fact that the workings of the Ministry of the Future itself are never described in any detail, to the point that we're left with only the understanding that they somehow "do things," without ever knowing how.

Some of the other blurbs on or inside this book go on to color The Ministry for the Future as "utopian."  This description is, to some extent, accurate, but I think that doing so does a disservice to other utopian novels, many of which were much better executed.

Related Entries: