2024年7月19日 星期五

"The Naked Ape" by Desmond Morris (1967)


"The only sound biological solution to the dilemma is massive de-population, or a rapid spread of the species on to other planets, combined if possible with assistance from all four of the courses of action already mentioned.  We already know that if our populations go on increasing at their present terrifying rate, uncontrollable aggressiveness will become dramatically increased."

The author of this book was an English zoologist, ethologist and surrealist painter.  He followed up The Naked Ape with 1969's The Human Zoo, and in 1973 a comedy film was loosely adapted from both The Naked Ape and its sequel.
 
The premise of this book is relatively straightforward.  The author posits that humankind, despite pretensions to the contrary, is really just another type of ape, and that a study of our primate relatives is the surest way to understanding the human condition.  We still have, he reasons, a lot in common with gorillas, chimpanzees and monkeys, even when one considers our migration from the forest canopy to open grassland several million years ago.
 
The Naked Ape is divided into eight sections, these being: Origins, Sex, Rearing, Exploration, Fighting, Feeding, Comfort and Animals.  Throughout these eight sections the author offers a fairly comprehensive overview of human behavior, with special attention paid to areas in which our ways of being are paralleled within other species.  For the most part he avoids larger discussions of culture in choosing his examples, but these omissions makes sense given his stated goals and method of investigation.
 
I liked this book a lot and it was an easy read.  I can't say it's an unusually insightful work, but it did offer some perspectives on "the naked ape" that I found interesting. 
 
Related Entries:
 

2024年7月6日 星期六

Still More 60s Movies

I'll be adding to this as I go along.

I'm discontinuing the "Where Are They Now?" section.  The 60s were a long time ago, and I think we can safely assume that most of the adults in these films are no longer with us.



Film noir, sex, violence and a distinctly Italian sensibility with regard to color and proportion: the elements of giallo are all here.  Director Mario Bava had a big influence on the horror genre, both in his own country and abroad.

The Premise: Several young women employed by an Italian fashion house are killed by a mysterious assailant.

Overall: As you might expect it's extremely stylish.  The characters are a bit thin, but maybe that's beside the point.



The Premise: A stylish superthief stays one step ahead of both organized crime and law enforcement.

Overall: You don't get more 60s than this movie.  It's like they inverted one of the James Bond films, turned everything up to 11, and the result is a glorious love letter to primary colors, cool cars and improbable gadgets.  The skirts are SHORT, the men are impeccably dressed, and many of the sets look like Ken Adam's fever dreams.

Mario Bava directed this film after Blood and Black Lace, and like that movie Danger: Diabolik isn't trying to say anything profound.  For those who can sit back and enjoy this kind of film it's a lot of fun.

Fun Fact 1: This movie was produced in tandem with Barbarella.

Fun Fact 2: A new trilogy of Diabolik films was released in 2021, 2022 and 2023.


3. El Cid (1961)

The Premise: Charlton Heston defends medieval Spain from enemies at home and abroad.

Overall: As big, bombastic Hollywood spectacles go this one is strictly mid-level.  I had some issues with the story, in particular El Cid's knack for turning up at opportune moments and Sophia Loren's change of heart halfway through the film.  It's certainly watchable, but by the same token it's also extremely forgettable.
 

 
The Premise: A convict and a troubled priest cross paths on a remote Polynesian island.
 
Overall: Spencer Tracy and Frank Sinatra play the kind of roles they were known for, but the setting is relatively novel and the threat posed by the island's active volcano is present without being too present. 
 
My one complaint (three complaints, really) is the ending.  Why did Frank Sinatra drive back up the mountain?  Why the pointless religious discussion after that point?  And why the "boy" there, after their companion sacrificed his life to save them all?

Fun Fact: Some see in The Devil at 4 O'Clock one of the earliest disaster movies, a genre (arguably) perfected during the following decade.
 

5. Tomb of Torture (1963)

"A good enema is what you need, and above all don't get frightened!"
 
The Premise: Low budget, Grindhouse-style horror feature in which several people fall victim to a deranged man lurking beneath a castle.

Overall: It's a fun little movie.  A HUGE bomb in Italy, where it was made and first released, but it did slightly better overseas.
 


The Premise: Jimmy Stewart and Co. attempt to extricate themselves from the desert after a crash landing.

Overall: The music dates it a bit, but if you can get past that aspect of the movie The Flight of the Phoenix is genuinely great.  Just think of the risks they took with this one.  The cool, calculating German as... the hero?  That was a BIG ask at the time, and this movie pulled it off.
 
Best Picture?  Best Director?: Robert Aldrich was up against The Sound of Music that year, so yeah, it wasn't going to happen, but in a parallel universe I would have gladly handed him an Oscar.

Fun Fact: This movie was remade in 2004 with Dennis Quaid in the lead role.
 


The Premise: Hot women and motorcycles, and in-between the leader of the gang tries to make off with a sexy local girl.

Overall: Some of the worst acting ever committed to celluloid.  The Wild One it definitely isn't.
 


The Premise: Something something China after the Boxer Rebellion.  I'm sorry, that's as far as I got.  That is so obviously NOT Peking (Beijing), and those are so obviously British people doing yellowface in the presence of Charlton Heston.

Overall: Sorry, I've lived in Taiwan for 24 years, I've spent much of that time studying Mandarin and Chinese history, and I just couldn't do this one.  It may well be a good movie if you can look past the glaring historical inaccuracies and the yellowface, not to mention the signage obviously written by people who didn't know how to write the language, but for me it was a bridge too far.
 


The Premise: Several inexplicably credulous strangers find themselves stranded on a mountain highway, convinced that it's the end of the world.

Overall: Interesting concept, but the script fails to fully realize it.  The characters are cardboard-thin, and everyone takes everything at face value.  By the end -- nuclear holocaust or not -- it's impossible to care about them one way or another.
 

10. Holiday in Spain (a.k.a. "Scent of Mystery") (1960)

The Premise: A British mystery writer finds himself involved in a mysterious plot after crossing paths with a beautiful woman in Spain.

Overall: Denholm Elliot's voiceovers REALLY wear out their welcome.  Both he and Peter Lorre are charming in their respective roles, but Elliot's character's running commentary is/was  unnecessary.  This said, this movie isn't bad so much as extremely forgettable.

Fun Fact: This was the first Smell-O-Vision movie.  Scents were released into the theater during key moments in the film.
 


The Premise: An unhappily married couple moves into a haunted house.

Overall: Good.  The screenplay was tightly constructed and the ending -- while something of a foregone conclusion -- makes sense.
 

12. Man in the Middle (a.k.a. "The Winston Affair") (1964)

The Premise: An army lawyer with little experience is called upon to defend a fellow serviceman accused of murder.

Overall: An excellent motion picture.  It was the kind of role that Robert Mitchum excelled at, and in director Guy Hamilton's hands not a second of screen time is wasted.

Fun Fact: In the world of Asian-American stage and screen France Nuyen was a trailblazer.  She played the female lead in 1958's South Pacific and originated the role of Suzie Wong for the play The World of Suzie Wong.
 

13. Salt and Pepper (1968)

Directed by Richard Donner!  Yes, that Richard Donner!  This was his second movie as director after 1961's X-15.
 
The Premise: Zaniness results once a mysterious woman infiltrates Sammy Davis Jr.'s and Peter Lawford's swinging London nightclub.

Overall: The cast features some very beautiful women, and the whole thing passes by breezily enough, but those looking for meatier fare are hereby directed elsewhere.  Salt and Pepper is more of a time capsule, showcasing the time and place that produced it.

Fun Fact: All things being equal, one day we'll see a movie based on Sammy Davis Jr.'s life.  Lord knows such a movie is long overdue.  In 2017 a production team which included Lionel Ritchie entered into an agreement with Sammy's estate with this goal in mind.
 

14. The Cardinal (1963)

The Premise: An ambitious young man rises through the ranks of the Catholic church.

Overall: Otto Preminger directed a lot of great movies and this is one of them.



The Premise: Something about industrial diamonds?  I'm not entirely sure.

Overall: The characters are engaging and there are some funny scenes in this movie, but the plot verges on incoherent.

Fun Fact: James Garner and costar Tony Franciosa were not fond of each other.  That fight near the end became a real physical altercation in the midst of the shoot.



The Premise: Bing Crosby and Bob Hope run afoul of a secret organization searching for an even more secret formula.

Overall: Aside from a lot of white people doing yellowface and random Chinese words in the background it's not as "racial" as you might expect.  The plot is largely irrelevant, but some of the gags are still funny.

Fun Fact 1: There are 6 other Road to... movies, the others being The Road to Singapore, The Road to Zanzibar, The Road to Morocco, The Road to Utopia, The Road to Rio and The Road to Bali.  The franchise extended from 1940 to 1962.  An eighth film, The Road to the Fountain of Youth, was planned but later canceled after Bing Crosby died of a heart attack.

Fun Fact 2: This movie was only shot in black and white to maintain the tone established in previous installments.



The Premise: Pirates Anthony Quinn and James Coburn contend with a boatload of precocious children.

Overall: The script focuses on the cute kids at the expense of the story.  The conflict between Coburn and Quinn should have been front and center.  With it pushed into the background the ending of this film is far from satisfying.


18. Poisoned Trust (a.k.a. "Nine Miles to Noon") (1963)

The Premise: An American con-man journeys to Greece to track down his ex-wife and son.

Overall: The boy playing the con-man's son is a good actor, but his character is so annoying that it distracts from the rest of the film.  There are countless movies from the time period featuring an estranged spouse in search of payback or personal enrichment, so there's no reason to seek this one out.


19. The Long Duel (1967)

The Premise: Yul Brynner marginally disrupts the British Empire in India after they impinge on his nomadic lifestyle.

Overall: A solid historical adventure with great performances from both Yul Brynner and Trevor Howard.

Fun Fact: Charlotte Rampling is in this.  She was around 20 at the time.

Related Entries:

2024年7月1日 星期一

"Hellboy: The Complete Short Stories Volumes 1 and 2" by Mike Mignola & Others (2018)


"Jeez!"

I'm very late in reading Hellboy.  I've seen all the movies of course, but the comics went right by me.

If you can imagine the old EC horror comics with a recurring red, wisecracking, demonic character that pretty much sums up Hellboy.  Weird stuff happens, Hellboy shows up, Hellboy fights the monster (usually with his fists), and that's about it.  This isn't to say that Mike Mignola's Hellboy is bad or even derivative, just to say that there's a very specific formula involved in most of these short stories, even if this formula is used well.

I very much enjoyed "The Crooked Man," a story which features Richard Corben's artwork.  Milennium Media has used this story as the basis for an upcoming movie, with Jack Kesy appearing as Hellboy.  It was filmed in Bulgaria and sounds super low budget, but if the trailer's promising I'll give it a look.

I also liked the African myth story which closes out Volume 2.  Given that Hellboy is often an excuse to explore various mythologies, this story offers us a glimpse of wider possibilities, in which Hellboy is a kind of Sandman-like character, adaptable to myths and folktales from any number of cultures.

Related Entries:

"Black Hawk Down" by Mark Bowden (1999)


"From his position behind the car, peering down one of the streets at their intersection, Nelson saw a man with a weapon ride out into the road on a cow.  There were about eight other men around the cow, some with weapons, some without.  It was the strangest battle party he'd ever seen.  He didn't know whether to laugh or shoot at it.  He and the rest of the Rangers at once started shooting.  The man on the cow fell off, and the others ran.  The cow just stood there.

"And at that moment, a Black Hawk slid overhead and opened fire with a minigun.  The cow literally came apart.  Great chunks of flesh flew up in splashes of blood.  When the minigun stopped and the chopper's shadow passed, what had been the cow lay in steaming pieces on the road."

Mark Bowden began his writing career as a staff writer for The Philadelphia Inquirer, later contributing articles to The Atlantic, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker and other periodicals.  His first book, Bringing the Heat, was published in 1994.  Black Hawk Down remains his best known work.

Black Hawk Down is an account of a U.S.-led military action in Somalia during the early 90s, an incursion which led to widespread news coverage after the corpses of several U.S. military personnel were paraded through the streets of Mogadishu.

Bowden's version of events is very spare, free of the "introspective approach" so often seen in other modern accounts of warfare.  Rather than using the business of war to discuss himself and/or the foibles of humanity as a whole, he restricts his account to what happened and why, detailing for the reader troop movements, the dispositions of the "enemy," and the various other factors that led to what some called "the deadliest day in decades."

I liked it.  The acronyms grow a bit confusing, but aside from that it's a solid, visceral book that makes an impression.  I was glad the author did without the philosophizing that so often marks this type of book, even if I think the event itself could have used more context.  I wanted to know more about why the U.S. was in Somalia, and I wanted to know more about what effect the Battle of Mogadishu had on U.S. foreign policy.

I also felt that the author's attempt to present the Somali side of the conflict was insufficient.  Taken as a story, the Somalis seen in Black Hawk Down are very undeveloped characters, and in the absence of sufficient information about them the author probably should have removed them from the narrative altogether.  As it is their presence weakens the book to some extent, rather than balances it as he probably hoped it would.

I haven't seen Ridley Scott's cinematic version since it appeared in theaters, and my memory of is extremely fuzzy.  I'd like to watch it again soon.

Related Entries: