顯示具有 samuel 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 samuel 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2023年10月12日 星期四

"Driftglass" by Samuel R. Delany (1971)


"The wind over his shoulder carried a smell I first thought was the machine.  Imagine a still that hasn't bathed for three months.  He flew very well."

Samuel R. Delany is a writer of both fiction and science fiction.  He has served as a Professor of English, Comparative Literature and Creative Writing at several American universities.  Driftglass is a collection of his short stories.

The Star Pit is a rather meandering story about a starship mechanic and his grudging love for a young boy.  The story posits the idea of "goldens," a race of hormonally adapted individuals who are capable of intergalactic travel.  Sounds good, right?  But the idea of these "goldens" is never tied into the overall narrative in any meaningful way, and for the most part it reads like a closeted gay man's plea for affection.

The next story, Dog in a Fisherman's Net, might be the best story in this collection.  Definitely not science fiction however.  This tale, centered around a death in the family and a submerged temple, works well up until the very end, when the protagonist makes a statement about himself that sounds both very forced and out of keeping with his character.

Corona has to do with telepathy.  It's not a bad story, but there are many similar stories from the time period and this one doesn't add much to the genre.

Aye, and Gomorrah is about a race of sexless, genetically engineered people who make a living by fulfilling the rest of humanity's sexual desires.  I like the idea, but the author doesn't take it anywhere meaningful.

Driftglass, the story for which this collection is named, dives into a world of merpeople busied with industrial pursuits.  It's one of the strongest stories in this collection.

We, in Some Strange Power's Employ, Move On a Rigorous Line is dedicated to Robert Zelazny, author of Lord of Light, which has also been reviewed here.  If you've read Lord of Light this story of "devils" and "angels" makes a certain kind of sense, but it's definitely one of the least accessible stories here.

The following tale, Cage of Brass, is somewhat weak.  It reads like a more modern take on Crime and Punishment or maybe one of Edgar Allen Poe's stories, but the concept of post-homicidal guilt really didn't need the "prison" setting.  I also felt that this setting could have been used to much greater effect by an author able to cut his or her stories down to their barest essentials.

High Weir is more like what I usually encounter in these late 60s/early 70s sci-fi anthologies.  A team of researchers makes a startling discovery on Mars, and what they learn in the course of their investigations drives one of them insane.  I think it's a worthy effort, even if I'm not sure whether or not the plot point involving the hologram makes any sense.

The next-to-last story, Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones is where I really struggled.  The protagonist is thoroughly uninteresting, his predicament seems irrelevant, and for people that live in the future none of the characters in this story seem to be trading in any noteworthy technologies.

Night and the Loves of Joe Diconstanzo closes out the book.  It's not terrible, but it seems like the sort of thing that Philip K. Dick did much better.  Dick would have trimmed this narrative right down to its core, and he would have added an ending that made you question your reality.  Samuel R. Delany, however, never accomplishes this task.

With all of the stories above considered, I can't recommend Samuel R. Delany.  I get that he's won awards and enjoyed a certain standing in the science fiction community, but I didn't find anything in this collection that made me want to read other books by the same author.  

To some extent he seems, like Ray Bradbury, to be a science fiction author who doesn't really want to be writing science fiction.  I also get the feeling that the concepts introduced in his stories would be better handled by authors more able to cut to the heart of the stories they are telling.

Related Entries:

2015年9月29日 星期二

"The Concise Pepys Diary" by Samuel Pepys (1669)


January 1659/1660

"Blessed be God, at the end of the last year I was in very good health, without any sense of my old pain, but upon taking of cold.  I lived in Axe Yard, having my wife, and servant Jane, and no other in family than us three."

September 2015

7th. Blessed be ?, at the beginning of this month I am in good health, without any sense of my old ADD, though troubled I am by work.  I live in Taitung, Taiwan, having my wife, our two daughters, and five cats, with no other family than us... nine.

September 1662

"3rd.  Mr. Coventry told us how the Fanatiques and Presbyters, that did intend to rise about this time, did choose this day as the most auspicious to them in their endeavors against monarchy: it being fatal twice to the King, and the day of Oliver's death.  But, blessed be God! all is likely to be quiet, I hope.  Dr. Fairbrother tells me, what I heard confirmed since, that it was fully resolved by the King's new Council that an indulgence should be granted..."

September 2015.

9th. Mr. Pepys does tell us how the King doth scheme against the Parliament, and the Parliament doth scheme against the King.  And when not scheming the King does busy himself with his mistresses, as Mr. Pepys does busy himself with the intrigues of court and the amassing of wealth.  It's all very repetitive, really, and many has been the time I've fallen asleep over this book.

February 1664/1665

"17th.  Povey tells me how my Lord Barkeley will say openly, that he hath sought more set fields than any man in England hath done."

September 2015

15th.  Almost halfway through this book.  Interesting; his comments upon Shakespeare.  It seems that the Bard and Mr. Pepys were contemporaries, and Mr. Pepys was not overly fond of Shakespeare's plays.  It makes me wonder what parts of our own culture will be exalted by future ages.  Will our love for Steven Spielberg and Dan Brown be justified by our descendants, or will they instead choose other elements of our culture to admire - aspects of it that we ourselves fail to notice?

January 1666/1667

"3rd.  This day, I hear, hath been a conference between the two Houses about the Bill for examining Accounts, wherein the House of Lords their proceedings in petitioning the King for doing it by Commission, are in great heat voted by the Commons, after the conference, unparliamentary."

September 2015

20th.  Got very drunk the other night.  But not Samuel Pepys.  He never gets drunk.  Or at least he never writes about it.  He is the Protestant work ethic personified.  And what ethic do I personify?  How is the age in which I live embodied in my person?

December 1667

"29th.  At night comes Mr. Turner to see us; and there, among other talk, she tells me that Mr. William Pen, who is lately come over from Ireland, is a Quaker again, or some very melancholy thing; that he cares for no company, nor comes into any; which is a pleasant thing, after his being abroad so long, and his father such a hypocritical rogue, and at this time an Atheist."

September 2015

25th.  I think I would like this Mr. Pepys, but he worries too much about other people.  He has a great desire to be liked, and so he is entirely too circumspect in his behavior.  But perhaps he can be excused this failing.  Perhaps it is only the effect of the time he lived in, when men great and small could be laid low at the whim of a King.

May 1669

"I all the afternoon drawing up a foul draught of my petition to the Duke of York about my eyes, for leave to spend three or four months out of the office, drawing it so as to give occasion to a voyage abroad; which I did to my pretty good liking.  And then with my wife to Hyde Park, where a good deal of company and good weather."

September 2015

28th.  Spent part of the afternoon writing this post about Samuel Pepys and his diary.  A long book, and most repetitious, but it was at times gratifying to find this very normal, very decent man living so long before me, in an age very different from my own.