2023年7月30日 星期日

"X-men: Battle of the Atom" by Brian Michael Bendis et al. (2013)

Sexiest (female) comic book character: Magick or Psylocke?  I'd have difficulty answering this question.  I was exposed to Magick at a much younger age, but Psylocke's "Eastern ninja thing" was more in line with both the kind of movies I was watching in the 80s and the kind of women I was fantasizing over.

But I've digressed before I've even started.  I was going to discuss Brian Michael Bendis' Battle of the Atom, wasn't I?  I should probably do that instead of sidestepping into the historically hot women of comic books. 

First, a bit of background.  Battle of the Atom is one of those "interim" X-men comics that follow the years in which "the X-men were important at Marvel" and Jonathan Hickman's House of X and Powers of X, which are regarded as a return to form.  This isn't to say that Bendis' work on the characters is bad or irrelevant, just that these "interim years" were disappointing for many fans, and that there was an impression that the mutants were being sidelined in favor of other, non-mutant characters that Marvel Studios had the rights to.

There was also a feeling that the X-men "couldn't catch a break," and yes, reading Battle of the Atom one gets a sense of this.  Just thinking of the deaths and upheavals that came before this series, yeah, it was a rough time to be a mutant.

In Battle of the Atom the X-men have split into two factions after the death of Charles Xavier.  One faction is led by Wolverine, the other by Cyclops.  At some point in the recent past these two factions were joined by the original X-men, who were transported to the future by Beast.  To these original X-men are then added a group of future X-men, who want the original X-men to return to their own time period so that everyone involved can avoid a catastrophic future.  Oh, and there's yet another group of X-men that show up, also from the future, to oppose the first group of future X-men, who may or may not be the good guys.  Confused yet?  I was.

But the problem with this comic book series isn't really the confusion it creates, but rather the ending, which just seems to represent a form of writer's block on the author's part.  After wading through so many iterations of the X-men, some of whose interactions are fun, one expects a grand finale, but this grand finale never arrives.  Instead the villain overexerts him/herself, and we're left with a series of epilogues that don't really add anything to the saga.

It's a comic book half full of good art and half full of mediocre art.  The story just barely holds together.  You could read it I suppose, but there are better comic books out there.

Related Entries:

2023年7月29日 星期六

"Animal Man by Grant Morrison: Book One" (1988-1989)

 
This is one of those comic book series that I've been hearing about forever.  "But have you read Grant Morrison's Animal Man?"  For the longest time my answer has been "Nope, nope and nope."

Well, now I've read it and now I know.

It's OK I guess.  It didn't blow me away like I was hoping it would.  According to the introduction (written by Morrison himself), he was scouted by DC after Alan Moore's uber-successful Watchmen.  It was the era of Moore and Gaiman, when DC was looking far and wide for cool new British, "literary" takes on American superhero comics.  This push by DC led to a lot of classic comic book series, many of which were released under the Epic imprint at Marvel or the Vertigo imprint at DC.

It was a heady time to be a comic book fan, and I'm proud to say I was right there, in the midst of it, absorbing titles such as Elektra: Assassin, Rick Veitch's The One and Marshal Law.  And yes, I loved Watchmen, despite the seemingly endless delays between issues.

Animal Man?  I missed it at the time, just as I largely missed Neil Gaiman's run on Sandman.  There was a lot of new, exciting stuff happening in comics back then, and some things just didn't capture my imagination, or else they simply got by me.  I might have read an issue or two of this comic when it first appeared; I really can't remember.

The Wikipedia entry credits Morrison's run on Animal Man with everything from postmodernism to quantum physics, but really, I wasn't finding it that deep.  The series certainly glosses over such things, but I don't know that it always does so in a meaningful way.  When you think about how Alan Moore integrated deeper thoughts into the Watchmen narrative, Animal Man comes out poorer by comparison.  But maybe Morrison better realized these concepts in the issues found within Book Two.  At the time of writing I can't say, though I'd like to think so.  He certainly went on to do a ton of great comics, my favorite probably being DC One Million, which gets delightfully bonkers towards the end.

Related Entries:

2023年7月23日 星期日

Academy Award Winners: 1929-1930


The third Academy Awards were held not long after the second Academy Awards.  They moved the date back so that the ceremony could be held closer to the eligibility period.  During this year the "Outstanding Picture" category was changed to "Outstanding Production."

Those interested are welcome to consult the Wikipedia article on the third Academy Awards.  What follow below are my thoughts on the Best Picture, Best Directing, Best Actor, Best Actress and Best Cinematography winners.

The Oscar ceremony recognizing movies released between August 1, 1929 to July 31, 1930 was held in 1930.


1. Outstanding Production: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)

2. Best Director: Lewis Milestone - All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)

Lewis Milestone also won Best Directing (Comedy) for 1927's Two Arabian Knights.
 
At this point I've seen all three filmed adaptations of Erich Maria Remarque's novel, these being the 1930 and 2022 versions released in theaters, and the 1979 made for TV movie.  Of these three versions the 1979 TV movie is my favorite, primarily because it strikes, in my opinion, the best balance between the humanity of its characters and the horror of war.
 
Which is not to say that Lewis Milestone's 1930 version is bad in any respect.  If it's not -- again, in my opinion -- as good as the 1979 version it's still excellent.  1930's All Quiet on the Western Front was a considerable technical achievement, and the story it tells is still just as timely.  Just compare this film to other World War I films of the time period, everything from Hell's Angels (below) to Wings.  It's head and shoulders above those other movies, and represents, moreover, a considerable improvement over the director's own Two Arabian Knights, which won him his first Academy Award a year previous.

Fun Fact 1: Many German war veterans served as extras in this film.

Fun Fact 2: The Nazis (Brownshirts) weren't fans of this movie's anti-war message.  They disrupted several screenings of it in the years leading up to World War II.


3. Best Actor: George Arliss - Disraeli (1929)

All but surrounded by Russian spies, Benjamin Disraeli attempts to grab control of the Suez Canal in the interests of the Crown.  I'm not well read on this era in British history, but I felt that the story was convincing and George Arliss is good in the lead role.


4. Best Actress: Norma Shearer - The Divorcee (1930)

Now here's a movie that goes down MUCH differently in 2023 that it did in 1930.  Is the main character's version of turnabout fair play?  Is her husband's offended jealousy unfounded?  Is a divorced woman "ruined?"  Is their marriage salvageable?  I suppose your answers to these questions in 2023 depend more on your lifestyle, religious affiliation, gender orientation and sexual orientation, and less on a publicly held morality that you feel you have to answer to.

My thoughts on The Divorcee?  It's a little too much like a play at times, and the scenes in the cabin leading up to the accident are confusing.  This said, once the protagonist crosses the altar it's a much easier movie to understand and to relate to.  Norma Shearer was a good actress, and I don't know that many of her contemporaries could have handled this role so well.


5. Best Cinematography: Willard Van der Veer - With Byrd at the South Pole (1930)

Documentary on Byrd's Antarctic Expedition.  The task of filming this expedition was indeed daunting, involving cameras mounted on boats, planes and even dogsleds.  With Byrd at the South Pole remains the only documentary to win an Oscar for cinematography.

Fun Fact: a lot of the money for this expedition came from the Ford Motor Company.  Byrd was good friends with Edsel Ford (for whom the car is named) and his father Henry Ford.


6. Honorable Mention: Hell's Angels (1930)

All Quiet on the Western Front?  In many way's Hell's Angels is the inverse of that movie, in other ways it's just not very good.  Some of the accents, for example, are atrocious, even if the scenes of aerial combat are an improvement over Wings, which won the Academy Award for Outstanding Picture two years before.

Jean Harlow was very sexy though, and producer and director Howard Hughes spared no expense in both filming Wings and converting this previously silent picture to sound.  I was familiar with this movie from both The Amazing Howard Hughes and The Aviator, and even though the dramatic elements often fall flat it's still an interesting watch.

Parting Thoughts
 
This round of Academy Award winners was much easier to sit through.  All Quiet on the Western Front is still a good movie with a lot to offer modern viewers.  The other films here?  I can't say that any of them are bad, but they require more effort on the part of the viewer.

Related Entries:
 
 

"The Pale King" by David Foster Wallace (2011)


 "He felt in a position to say he knew now that hell had nothing to do with fires and frozen troops.  Lock a fellow in a windowless room to perform rote tasks just tricky enough to make him think, but still rote, tasks involving numbers that connected to nothing he'd ever see or care about, a stack of tasks that never went down, and nail a clock to the wall where he can see it, and just leave the man there to his mind's own devices."

David Foster Wallace was an American author best known for Infinite Jest, a notoriously difficult book.  He took his own life in 2008, and what we have in The Pale King was assembled from an unfinished draft and a collection of notes he left for others to find.  My rather flippant review of Infinite Jest can be found here.

Long story short, I wasn't a huge fan of Infinite Jest, though I didn't find it as turgid or as deliberately obscure as a friend led me to believe.  Infinite Jest was definitely a struggle to get through, but I found it much easier going than other postmodern books like Gravity's Rainbow or The Flounder.  Extensive breaks were required in the midst of reading Infinite Jest, but it wasn't that bad.

With The Pale King there's less "noise" surrounding both the novel and its author.  You're not likely to approach this book without already knowing something about its author and having read something else by him, and the introduction makes it clear that this novel is unfinished.  This introduction engenders a forgiving attitude in the reader, both with regard to the novel's own merits and Wallace's skill as a writer.

What's it about?  Well, like the person who wrote the introduction I'm offering only my best guess, but if you ask me it's about political maneuvering within a particular branch of the IRS.  On another level it's about boredom and how it shapes us as individuals.  I can't think of any other major threads in this incomplete work, but there might be some.

Did I like it?  Well, I found it easier to get through than Infinite Jest.  There are some genuinely interesting passages in this book, even if I'm still not sure that all those chapters on the workings of the IRS were worth wading through.  Upon finishing The Pale King I found my opinion of the author much improved, though I have to say I still prefer his nonfiction.

In case you haven't seen it, 2015's The End of the Tour, featuring Jason Segel as David Foster Wallace, is a good movie.  As a writer Wallace continues to cast a long shadow, and whether you love him or hate him you can't deny his influence.

Related Entries:

2023年7月15日 星期六

Academy Award Winners: 1928-1929


The second Academy Awards narrowed down the categories to those we know today.  I think this was a cogent move on the Academy's part, as expecting the public to differentiate between the two Best Picture winners and the two Best Director winners was asking too much.

Those interested are welcome to consult the Wikipedia article on the second Academy Awards.  What follow below are my thoughts on the Outstanding Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress and Best Cinematography winners.

The Oscar ceremony recognizing movies released between August 1, 1928 to July 31, 1929 was held in 1930.


1. Outstanding Picture: The Broadway Melody (1929)

Denied!  Couldn't track down a copy of this one.  There's a clip on YouTube, and judging by the subject matter that's as far as I'm willing to go.  I'm not that into musicals, and I'd rather not pay for the privilege of watching it.

Considered by many to be the first complete musical, the contemporary critical assessment of The Broadway Melody was lukewarm.  Modern reviewers have been even less kind to the picture, and its rating on sites such as Rotten Tomatoes is unsurprisingly low.  In retrospect it seems to have been more of a technical achievement than an artistic one.


2. Best Director: Frank Lloyd - The Divine Lady (1929)

The days of silent film might have been numbered, but this movie, which featured synchronized sound minus dialogue, still won Best Director.  It's the story of Admiral Nelson's affair with a married woman during the Napoleonic Wars, and I'm guessing it won on both the strength of its battle scenes and the surprise hit song it introduced to the public. 

Fun Fact: the star of this film, Corinne Griffith, invested in real estate in and around Beverly Hills and died one of the richest women in the world.  During divorce proceedings in the 1960s, she claimed to not be Corinne Griffith, but rather Griffith's younger or twin sister, who took over the role of "Corinne Griffith" after the real Corinne Griffith died in 1920 or 1924.  To this day no one has been able to either prove or falsify this claim.


3. Best Actor: Warner Baxter - In Old Arizona (1928)

The first feature-length "talkie."  In Old Arizona is a lighthearted look at the Old West, with The Cisco Kid caught between a womanizing army sergeant and a duplicitous young woman.  Nothing in this movie is especially authentic, and I can only assume that star Warner Baxter won the Oscar due to the fact that he could act and speak at the same time.  He's definitely not bad in this movie, and some of the dialogue is clever, but I wasn't feeling "Oscar" here.

 
4. Best Actress: Mary Pickford - Coquette (1929)

Mary Pickford stars as a rather insincere Southern belle forced to choose between an earnest suitor and a jealous father.  Is it just me, or is this the kind of role rarely offered to actresses now?  Whatever the case, Pickford deserved her Oscar.
 
There is, by the way, a documentary about her on YouTube.  By 1929 most of her career was behind her, but she'd be involved in the film industry up until the 1940s. Alongside Charlie Chaplin, D.W. Griffith and her then-husband Douglas Fairbanks, Pickford was one of the "united artists" who founded the production company of the same name.


5. Best Cinematography: Clyde De Vinna - White Shadows in the South Seas (1928)

Racial politics at work in the Marquesas.  I suppose Clyde De Vinna won the Oscar for the underwater scenes featuring pearl divers.  Overall this movie is very heavy-handed and I wouldn't recommend it.


6. Honorable Mention: Blackmail (1929)

Alfred Hitchcock's first film with sound.  Of all the movies discussed in this and the previous entry, I found Blackmail the most interesting.  Curious about movie history?  Sunrise and Metropolis are must-see films.  Looking to watch a great performance?  Mary Pickford in Coquette and Emil Jannings in The Last Command stand out.  But however good these other movies are, Blackmail is far more absorbing.  The performances, the staging, the way in which it was filmed all point toward an attention to detail that would loom large over subsequent decades of movie history, anticipating not only the director's own Psycho and Frenzy but also the British film industry as a whole.

Parting Thoughts
 
Hopefully I'm done with silent films with this entry.  Honestly, my patience with them is wearing thin.  Sitting through movies such as 7th Heaven and White Shadows in the South Seas has been instructive, but I'll be glad to see the silent era draw to a close with this entry.  I admire both the art and the artifice at work in those films, but I also enjoy the sound of people talking.

Related Entries:
 

2023年7月9日 星期日

Academy Award Winners: 1927-1928


The first Academy Awards ceremony was very different from the version familiar to us today.  Instead of a single "Best Picture" category there were awards for both "Outstanding Picture" and "Best Unique and Artistic Picture."  Likewise the Oscars for "Best Director" were divided between "Best Directing (Comedy Picture)" and "Best Directing (Dramatic Picture)."

Those interested are welcome to consult the Wikipedia article on the very first Academy Awards.  What follow below are my thoughts on the Best Picture, Best Directing, Best Actor and Best Actress winners.

The Oscar ceremony recognizing movies released between August 1, 1927 to July 31, 1928 was held in 1929, which is when the picture above was taken.


1. Outstanding Picture: Wings

Two aspiring pilots find themselves at odds over a beautiful socialite as America enters World War I.  In 2023 this silent film resembles nothing so much as a series of cut scenes from a video game, and I was surprised how easy it was to watch.

The aerial combat scenes (and, to a lesser extent, this tracking shot) blew people's minds in 1927, and Wings was also one of the first big movies to show both male and female nudity.  Clara Bow, who appears as one of the two love interests, was a huge sex symbol in the late 20s, and her likeness features on many of the posters for Wings.

Fun Fact: Margot Robbie's character in 2022's Babylon is based on Clara Bow.  Many of the rumors regarding Bow's sexual proclivities were, however, untrue.


2. Best Unique and Artistic Picture: Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

German director F.W. Murnau's first American feature, and a film often referred to as "the greatest silent movie ever made."  It's more technically accomplished than the other movies discussed here, but I'm not sure that it holds up as well in terms of story.

After Sunrise Murnau would go on to make three more films, 4 Devils, City Girl and Tabu: A Story of the South Seas4 Devils was lost after its release in theaters, and Tabu was released after the director's death in 1931.


3. Best Directing (Comedy): Lewis Milestone (Two Arabian Knights)

Brought to you by Howard Hughes!

In Two Arabian Knights a pair of American POWs try to evade the Germans while contesting for the love of a beautiful Arab princess. I can only assume that audiences in 1927 found this movie hilarious, because it sure wasn't doing anything for me.

Star William Boyd would go on to portray Hopalong Cassidy for many years after. Director Lewis Milestone had a long career ahead of him, helming such films as All Quiet on the Western Front, The Front Page and Of Mice and Men.


4. Best Directing (Drama): Frank Borzage (7th Heaven)

A Parisian street cleaner takes in a woman down on her luck.  7th Heaven lost in the "Outstanding Picture" category to Wings, but Frank Borzage won Best Director (Drama) for his skillful handling of this story of love found in an unlikely place.

A remake of this movie set in the modern day could work very well.  The desperation, the search for love and the idea of divine intervention in human affairs are all just as relevant today as they were in 1927.


5. Best Actor: Emil Jannings (The Last Command and The Way of All Flesh)

Of the movies discussed here The Last Command is my favorite by far.  It tells a timely story of a great man's rise and fall, the way in which it tells this story is both precise and sweeping in scope, and Emil Jannings is undeniably great in the lead role.  I'm neither here nor there with Janet Gaynor winning the first-ever Best Actress award, but yeah, Jannings amply deserved his Best Actor Oscar.

Unlike the other movies discussed here, all of which saw release in 1927, The Last Command was released in 1928,

Sad Fact: Jannings would go on to star in several Nazi propaganda films leading up to WWII.  His doing so effectively ended his career in movies.


6. Best Actress: Janet Gaynor (7th Heaven, Street Angel and Sunrise)

I haven't seen Street Angel and I probably never will, but Gaynor's haunting eyes and doll-like face add a lot to the two movies in her filmography that I've seen.  Of these two movies I definitely prefer 7th Heaven, as she passes through a much wider range of emotions in that film.


7. Honorable Mention: Metropolis

One of the earliest science fiction movies and, I would argue, the most culturally relevant film of 1927. Director Fritz Lang made Metropolis while still resident in Germany, and it showcases both his German expressionism and his awe of America, the country he would later call home.

In terms of depth I'm not sure if the biblical themes are as profound as some make them out to be, but Metropolis remains a classic.

Parting Thoughts
 
Taking only the movies discussed here into consideration, the Germans seemed to have had an effect on cinema far disproportionate to the number Germans actively involved in making films at the time.  F.W. Murnau, Fritz Lang and Emil Jannings are all evidence of this trend.  The German influence would wane after World War II, but it's surprising how strong a presence they were up until that point.

All in all I enjoyed the films above, even if my mind wandered at times.  It's funny, but I can almost remember some of them as if the characters in them were audible.  In the absence of sufficient sensory input, I suppose our minds always want to fill in the blanks, and this "weakness" of the human brain works, I further suppose, to either our advantage and disadvantage depending on the situation.

Looking to give silent films a try?  These movies would be a good place to start.  I can't see myself venturing still further backward into the history of film anytime soon, but this era in movie-making is definitely less foreign to me now.

Related Entries:

2023年7月7日 星期五

"The Body" by Bill Bryson (2019)


"Epilepsy likewise is a perpetual mystery, but with the additional burden that sufferers have been shunned and demonized throughout history.  Well into the twentieth century, it was commonly believed by medical authorities that seizures and infections -- that just watching someone have a seizure could provoke a seizure in others."

Bill Bryson has written many, many books on many, many topics.  I swear I've read other books by the same author, but the only one reviewed here is One Summer: America 1927.  Which of his other books have I read?  For the life of me I can't remember.

Bryson is, by the way, an American author.  If he sounds British it's because he's lived there most of his life.  I didn't find his writing style in One Summer: America 1927 to be particularly British, but while reading The Body I often wondered which side of the Atlantic he was writing from.

In The Body, a book I found slightly less engaging than One Summer, Bryson takes us on a tour of the human body.  Along the way he discusses various breakthroughs in medicine, surgery and our understanding of how our bodies function, all of which he summarizes in two separate discussions of birth and death at the end of the book.

Very few of the physiological details introduced in this book were new to me, though I did find the anecdotes regarding forgotten doctors, barbaric medical treatments and other oddities very interesting.  Who knew that the medieval cure for gallstones was so horrific?  Who knew that so many doctors and scientists could be so petty when it came to credit for certain discoveries?  It's these little bits of trivia that make The Body worth reading, even if some of the descriptions of bodily processes are only there to pad out the book.

On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd give The Body a solid 7.  It's not as absorbing as I thought it'd be, but I never found it dull.  Compared to the other book by Bryson that I can actually remember reading, it's definitely an inferior effort, but in Bryson's case an inferior effort is still a very readable book.  He shows a characteristic command of his subject throughout, he's obviously done his research, and if a better book on the same subject is out there we'll just have to hope we stumble across it.

Related Entries: