顯示具有 series 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 series 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2026年7月3日 星期五

Thoughts on 1966-1967's Ultraman TV Show 3


Almost done with the original series!  I think I might watch some vintage anime after this entry - there seems to be a lot of it on YouTube.

If you've enjoyed these entries I'm glad.  Writing them has certainly been an eye-opening experience for me, and at some point in the future I'll probably continue on to Ultraseven, the next Ultraman series after the original run.



Space creatures invade a cosmic ray research center, miniaturize various scientists, and cause general distress.

This episode's monster's name, "Dada," is, by the way, a reference to the avant-garde art movement which developed around World War I.  Dadaism came after the cubist movement, and often involves cutting and pasting words or images.  David Bowie used the Dada approach to writing poetry to craft the lyrics to many of his early songs.



"Golden Monster Goldon."  Try saying that five times fast.

As monsters go Goldon is bad news.  He eats up gold and hides inside the earth, and he likes to stomp mountain villages.  Cap and Ide take a new vehicle, the Vellucidar into the subterranean depths to catch him, but that goes badly and Ultraman has to save the day again.



Things get mythological when a hunter angers the monster Woo by pursuing a "snow girl" into the mountains.  Said Woo is NOT COOL with hunters bothering its lady friends.



One of my favorite episodes.  It makes almost no sense from beginning to end.

The Science Patrol gets a new member, or at least a transfer from the Science Patrol's South American branch, and this transfer isn't all that he first appears to be.

Yes, Random Scientist Guy, any civilization founded by blood-drinking sentient plants is doomed to failure!



Zumbolar is one of the cuter monsters.  It must have been really hot to stomp around in those flames wearing that suit.

In this episode "Patty," visiting from the Science Patrol's India branch (!), fails to help the Science Patrol deal with Zumbolar's stompiness and general disregard for both public and private property.

No idea why they suddenly feel sorry for Zumbolar at the end of this episode.  It's not like he was any more or less sympathetic than the other kaiju.



This Mefilas is a real tool.  I bet he hangs out with Alien Baltan when he's not attempting to seize other species' planets.

But for whatever reason Mefilas needs a particular (human) boy to verbally cede the Earth to him, and what follows are some weird "torture" sequences involving the boy and his sister, Akiko.  In the course of this "torture" Mefilas (as you would expect?) turns the lovely Akiko into a kaiju, and the Science Patrol has to pull its punches when it comes to fighting the city-wide destruction which results.

At the end Ultraman just kind of says "Fuck it," and lets Mefilas fly off.  Mefilas vows to return, hoping for some future human who will say "The Earth is yours!" so he can take over.

In case Mefilas is reading this, I recommend journeying to Las Vegas or some similar city next time.  After people have gone through the last few dollars in their bank accounts THAT'S the time to swoop in and ask: "Hey, would you mind handing over the entire planet to me?"



Cap has Hayata fly the VTOL over just to deliver an umbrella?  That's not a waste of public or private resources... at all!

Kinda weird including a suicide in the first five minutes of a kid's show, but then again they did the same thing in the Spider-Man series.  Japan is... Japan.

You can tell the actors involved had more fun making this one.  There are fun little improvised (?) scenes of them waking up in the middle of the night, drinking beer and (I'm not making this up) shooting a rocket up a kaiju's ass.  Japan is - again - Japan.



Satisfyingly ridiculous.  In this episode the Science Patrol decides to have a Buddhist funeral for all the monsters Ultraman's thrown into space.

Seabozu is a sad, skeletal-type monster who just wants to leave the Earth's atmosphere.  Why be dicks about it, Science Patrol?  Why attack him when he just needs a hug?  Why not just help him leave?

Anyway, don't ask me to explain it, but after a lot of weird empathizing with the kaiju the Science Patrol dresses up a rocket to look like Ultraman, and uses this rocket to shoot Seabozu back into space.



The Science Patrol fights a Doomsday-like monster that gets stronger every time they attack it.  Arashi ("the Spider Shot guy") goes rogue for a bit and helps Ultraman take the monster down in the end.



It's time to get meta.  Pigmon shows up in a Tokyo department store and looks over some choice Ultraman toys.  After that Ide invents a machine to translate Monster Language into human speech (no thanks to the professor!) and they find out that a MONSTER APOCALPYSE is about to happen if they don't defeat Geronimon, a kaiju that has resurrected all of Ultraman's defeated foes.

....the end result being Ide's realization that Ultraman helps those that help themselves... even if poor Pigmon does get squished in the process.



Our Heroes journey to Planet Q to retrieve something called a "BM Fuse" for a damaged space station.



What a weird end to the series.  Aliens decide to invade the Earth and Ultraman loses - for the second time in the entire series - to an alien adversary.  The difference in this instance being that he really does die - or something - and then decides to "sacrifice himself" for the sake of Hayata, his human host.  At this point Zoffy, an emissary sent from the Land of Light, takes Ultraman back there in a big red globe.

BUT... what about the undefeated kaiju?  What about the alien invasion?  Is the world still doomed?  The Science Patrol, busy saying goodbye to Ultraman, is completely oblivious to such matters!

After watching this episode I'm no longer sure that the series is set in the distant future.  The scientist guy mentions that the aliens have been making contact since the 1930s, and that the alien invasion is the result of forty years of planning.  So, at the latest, this series takes place in the 1970s, a little after the episode's broadcast date.  An earlier episode described the Cold War as an event occurring in the distant past.  Who knows?

Anyway, that's it for Ultraman for now.  I'll be watching other things for a while, and, as said above, I may work my way (back) to Ultraseven in the fall.

Related Entries:

2025年10月19日 星期日

"Caliban's War" by James S.A. Corey (2012)


"Her boss had secretly started a war.  He was working with the same corporations that had let the genie out of the bottle on Phoebe, sacrificed Eros, and threatened everything human."

Caliban's War is the sequel to Leviathan Wakes.  It's also the second book in James S.A. Corey's Expanse series.  For a review of Leviathan Wakes and more background on the authors click here.

Where Leviathan Wakes was something of a home run, Caliban's War is more of a "walk," in that it doesn't work quite as well its predecessor.  The plot is a little clumsier, and doesn't find the same rhythm as the book that came before it.

This episode finds the forces of Earth, Mars and the OPA facing the continued threat posed by the alien protomolecule, a lifeform impervious to the best minds humanity has to offer.  In the years after the events described in Leviathan Wakes the protomolecule has transformed the surface of Venus, and recent genetic experiments combining human DNA with this protomolecule pose a threat to human settlements in the Jovian system.

Enter our cast of ragtag space mercenaries, these being James Holden, their intrepid captain, Amos, the engineer, Naomi, the ops specialist and Alex, their pilot.  In Caliban's War they are joined by Bobbie, a Martian marine, Prax, a scientist from Ganymede and Avasarala, a UN politician playing great games for big stakes.

All of which sounds riveting, but this book's big conclusion falls rather flat.  It builds and builds towards Prax reuniting with his young daughter, but when this event finally occurs it's something of a letdown.  This book needed more of an antagonist aside from the protomolecule, someone the reader could root against.  As it is the story feels somewhat unbalanced, and not aimed toward any particular conclusion.

It might sound like I didn't like Caliban's War, but it's not that at all.  I enjoyed it.  It's just that Caliban's War is a very, very far cry from Leviathan Wakes, and inevitable comparisons between the two novels are going to occur.  

Inferior sequels are, however, ubiquitous in science fiction, and in this regard Caliban's War is not unusual.  I'm thinking that the authors probably regain their footing in the third book, and that this third book is much more cohesive than the second.

Related Entries:

2021年3月18日 星期四

The Boys (I Know I'm Late to the Party)


Those who've been reading this blog for a while might think I've given up on the superhero TV shows.  This is not the case, though I have to admit that I gave up on the Marvel Netflix shows after The Defenders.  The CW stuff never did much for me.

I did, however, recently watch the first two episodes of Superman and Lois.  The verdict?  I thought they were terrible.  Bad, bad dialogue.  Good production values, a good cast, maybe a decent story, but really bad dialogue.  Sorry to offend fans of the show, but I wasn't into it.

But maybe part of my problem was that I'd already seen the first season of The Boys long before.  After you've seen Homelander murder people it's hard to see Superman the same way.  I (fucking) loved The Boys, whereas Superman and Lois suffered by comparison.

To be more specific, I watched the first season of The Boys not long after it came out.  I was unfamiliar with Garth Ennis' comic series, though I'd read a lot of his work on Preacher, Crossed and various Punisher books.  No, what brought me to The Boys was its similarity to a much older comic series, Marshal Law.

In case you're unfamiliar with Marshal Law, and to be fair, many people aren't familiar, he appeared in the late 80s under Marvel's Epic Comics imprint.  He was a super-powered policeman operating in a world full of deranged superheroes, in the wake of a Vietnam War-style conflict overseas.  The series was written by Pat Mills and drawn by Kevin O'Neill.  Both writer and artist were British, and they used Marshal Law as a way of poking fun at American superheroes.

Marshal Law didn't last long at Epic.  Mills and O'Neill later took the character to other comic book companies, but he nevertheless remained an obscure character, known only to those versed in the adult-oriented comics from the late 80s and early 90s.


Garth Ennis, by the way, was aware of Marshal Law before he began writing The Boys.  But where Marshal Law focuses on a single character, The Boys is centered around a group of anti-supe "terrorists."  Where Marshal Law was full of pyrotechnics and adrenaline-fueled sex and gore, The Boys has more of a story.  I will always love Marshal Law, but it would have been hard to make a movie or TV show out of the original series.

What the Amazon Prime series adds to this mix is some great writing handed over to some great actors.  Jack Quaid (son of Dennis), Karl Urban, Karen Fukuhara and most of all Antony Starr, a kiwi actor who absolutely kills it as Homelander.  I don't know where they found half of these people, but they were well chosen.  Karl Urban was the only obvious choice, given his work on Dredd.

I think the first season of The Boys has the best moments, and the second season tells a better story.  That scene in the first season wherein Homelander is encouraged to breastfeed, the laser-shooting baby in the hospital, and even the way Jack's Quaid's girlfriend is killed in the first episode are all great.  I don't know which of these moments were present in the comics, but even if they were present it's not a given that they'd have the same kind of impact in the same kind of way.

The second season?  Man, there are so many twists and turns there.  Stormfront and her backstory are front and center in the second season, and I veered between hating her and feeling sorry for her.  The ending of this season, with the beatdown and the way a major character dies really sets it above the first season.  But both seasons are great in different ways.  

Going from this kind of show to Superman and Lois isn't easy.  Wandavision?  Maybe, but Wandavision also isn't on the same level as The Boys.  I could still watch and enjoy Wandavision, whereas a helping of Superman and Lois just made me wonder why nobody says "fuck" in that universe, and how such wholesome people (even their "troubled" sons) can stand to be around one another.  I get that the caustic humor present in The Boys puts a lot of people - especially religious people - off, but once you've gotten into The Boys it's hard to take Superman and Lois all that seriously.

I will say that doing a spinoff of The Boys is worrying.  This kind of move usually indicates a loss of quality.  But I'm looking forward to the third season of The Boys just the same.  Between now and then I suppose I'll have to tide myself over with The Snyder Cut, provided of course that The Boys hasn't corrupted that for me as well.


Related Entries:


P.S. Here's a thought: what's preventing anyone from including Marshal Law in The Boys universe?  He's now owned by his creators, and all they need to is sign off on the inclusion.

2016年3月3日 星期四

Fox's X-men Movies 1

I've been re-watching Fox's X-men films, and I thought I'd write about them before they vanish from my memory.  One of these movies is great, three others are good, but the other three are completely forgettable.  It's the forgettable ones that I'm trying hardest to keep in mind, since for me they have a mental half-life of a day, maybe two at the most.

To recap briefly, there have been 8 movies in Fox's X-men universe so far.  A ninth is on the way this summer, in the guise of X-men: Apocalypse.

The films in this series and their years of release are:

X-men (2000)
X2: X-men United (2003)
X-men: The Last Stand (2006)
X-men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
X-men: First Class (2011)
The Wolverine (2013)
X-men: Days of Future Past (2014)
Deadpool (2016) 

And of course there's also Apocalypse, due later this year, and the third Wolverine movie, due in 2017.  There are also plans for a Deadpool sequel, which might also come out in 2017, and the endlessly discussed New Mutants, X-Force, and Gambit films, all of which may or may not become a reality.


Watching the first X-men in 2016 is strange.  Hugh Jackman looks so damn young, and the tone of that movie is so different from more recent entries in the series.  It's pretty derivative as superhero films go - this was, after all, done before Sam Raimi's Spider-Man - but in 2000 this was about the best we could expect from any superhero film.

If I have a real complaint about the first X-men, it's that Ian Mckellan was always too old to play Magneto.  Yes, he is/was a great actor, and 2000 was a high point in his career, but he never comes across as threatening, or as virile, as he should be.

And yes, Sabretooth never recognizes Wolverine.  Even though they are supposed to be brothers.  Even though they fought in several wars together.  Even though they were costars in X-men Origins: Wolverine.

Almost all of the (other) X-men, right from the beginning, are completely uninteresting characters.  You would think in an ensemble film like this one they'd have more to do, but no, not really.  I think Singer was wise to recognize that Wolverine is the star of the show, but Logan completely overwhelms every other character in this movie, to the point where you begin wondering why they are there, and why he puts up with them at all.


I think the sequel, X2, was slightly better.  It holds together - just barely - and it's a lot faster-paced.  

In this film Stryker attempts to use both Xavier and Cerebro to destroy all of the mutants, and Magneto and the X-men must band together to stop him.  The fight between Wolverine and Lady Deathstrike is great, though Nightcrawler is so annoying that he almost ruins the entire movie.

And why did Jean Grey need to sacrifice herself at the end?  Couldn't she have stopped the water from inside the Blackbird?  And wouldn't simply levitating the Blackbird above the flood have been easier than diverting all that water around the plane?  And why did Logan have to choose between Stryker and his fellow mutants?  Why not just cut Stryker loose from his chains, and then pump him for information later?

In my opinion, the absolute worst part of X2 is when Magneto and Mystique are aboard the Blackbird, and they're "gossiping" about Rogue.  It's the kind of scene that would have made sense if all of those present were gay men, but it's far less convincing with a mixed group of male and female superheroes.


But then again, nothing in X2 is even half as bad as most of X-Men: The Last Stand.  Anyone who's seen this movie will remember the classic line "I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!" and other embarrassing moments.  Can anyone tell me, for example, exactly why Magneto had to levitate the Golden Gate Bridge?  Why not just put himself and his friends on a bus, and levitate that?  And if all those phials of "demutating" serum are lying around, why did Logan have to kill Phoenix in the end?  Why not just do the same thing to her that he and Beast had already done to Magneto?

I will say, however, that the scene where Phoenix kills the Professor is one of the best scenes in any of the X-Men movies.  But the real problem is that the movie doesn't go anywhere after that.  It gets bogged down in this "demutating serum" subplot, even though this subplot only diminishes the threat that Phoenix represents.

It's nice, however, to see Cyclops killed near the beginning of this movie.  He is annoying throughout all of the first three X-Men films, and it's pleasant to see Jean Grey finally drain him of all his life force.


After X-men: The Last Stand it would be three more years before the next entry, X-men Origins: Wolverine, would hit theaters.  By 2009 the movie landscape was also looking quite different, with the success of both Marvel's Iron Man and Warner Bros.' Batman Begins as established facts.  Movie audiences were expecting a lot more from their superhero movies by that time, and the reaction to Wolverine's first solo outing would reflect this trend.

In retrospect though, X-men Origins: Wolverine isn't all that bad.  In some respects it's a return to a more streamlined, action-oriented format along the lines of the first Ghost Rider, or even the first Spider-Man.  To be sure, both of those films are better than Wolverine's movie, but at least it isn't the disaster that the third X-Men was.

The real trouble with X-men Origins: Wolverine is, of course, that it plays havoc with the series' continuity.  By having us follow Wolverine from his earliest years to the present day, it calls into question all the X-men movies that came before it.  It also manages to bungle Deadpool, one of the most popular characters from the comics.

Yet as bad as Origins might be, let's not forget that it was the success (!) of that movie that paved the way for X-men: First Class three years after.  The plot of First Class even includes elements of a script written for an undeveloped film: X-men Origins: Magneto, which was to follow the blueprint laid down in Wolverine's first solo effort.

But I think it would be better to delve into X-Men: First Class next time, especially since it represents a kind of "new beginning" for the series.  This entry is also VERY long already, and I'll need some time to rest, reflect, and re-watch some more movies before going any further.

2015年12月16日 星期三

Bond: The Conclusion!


So what have I learned from my 007 movie marathon?  Well, for one thing, I learned that watching all of the Bond movies in order takes a really long time, and, for another thing, I learned that a lot of the Bond movies were better than I remembered.  Sure, a couple of them were worse than I remembered, but many of them were better.

The Bond films (as of late 2015) are, in order:

Dr. No (Sean Connery, 1962)
From Russia With Love (Sean Connery, 1963)
Goldfinger (Sean Connery, 1964)
Thunderball (Sean Connery, 1965)
You Only Live Twice (Sean Connery, 1967)
Casino Royale (David Niven, 1967)*
On Her Majesty's Secret Service (George Lazenby, 1969)
Diamonds are Forever (Sean Connery, 1971)
Live and Let Die (Roger Moore, 1973)
The Man with the Golden Gun (Roger Moore, 1974)
The Spy Who Loved Me (Roger Moore, 1977)
Moonraker (Roger Moore, 1979)
For Your Eyes Only (Roger Moore, 1981)
Never Say Never Again (Sean Connery, 1983)*
Octopussy (Roger Moore, 1983)
A View to a Kill (Roger Moore, 1985)
The Living Daylights (Timothy Dalton, 1987)
License to Kill (Timothy Dalton, 1989)
Goldeneye (Pierce Brosnan, 1995)
Tomorrow Never Dies (Pierce Brosnan, 1997)
The World is Not Enough (Pierce Brosnan, 1999)
Die Another Day (Pierce Brosnan, 2002)
Casino Royale (Daniel Craig, 2006)
Quantum of Solace (Daniel Craig, 2008)
Skyfall (Daniel Craig, 2012)
Spectre (Daniel Craig, 2015)

*These two film were not made by Eon Productions, the production company usually associated with the Bond films.  Thus they are regarded as outside the normal continuity.

I offer here a few lists of five.  Make of them what you will. 


I. My Top Five Bond Movies

1. Skyfall (2012)
2. Casino Royale (2006)
3. Goldfinger (1964)
4. On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
5. GoldenEye (1995)

II. The Best Bond Movies, According to Rotten Tomatoes 

1. Dr. No, From Russia with Love, and Goldfinger (96%)
2. Casino Royale (95%)
3. Skyfall (93%)
4. Thunderball (86%)
5. On Her Majesty's Secret Service (82%)


III. My Five Least Favorite Bond Movies

1. Casino Royale (1967)
2. A View to a Kill (1985)
3. Octopussy (1983)
4. License to Kill (1989)
5. Spectre (2015)

IV. The Worst Bond Movies, According to Rotten Tomatoes

1. Casino Royale (1967) (29%)
2. A View to a Kill (35%)
3. Octopussy (42%)
4. The Man with the Golden Gun (45%)
5. The World is Not Enough (51%)


V. My Top Ten Bond Villains

1. Auric Goldfinger (Goldfinger)
2. Ernst Blofeld (On Her Majesty's Secret Service)
3. Raoul Silva (Skyfall)
4. Le Chiffre (Casino Royale)
5. Hugo Drax (Moonraker)


VI. My Top Five Hottest Bond Girls

1. Sophie Marceau (The World is Not Enough)
2. Eva Green (Casino Royale)
3. Jane Seymour (Live and Let Die)
4. Barbara Bach (The Spy Who Loved Me)
5. Talisa Soto (License to Kill)


VII. My Top Five Bond Theme Songs

1. Goldfinger
2. Live and Let Die
3. Goldfinger
4. Skyfall
5. GoldenEye

VIII. My Ideas for Future Bond Movies

1. Make a movie in which Bond does NOT go to the U.K., the U.S., or the Bahamas.  Maybe put him somewhere unusual, like Turkmenistan, and keep him there for the entire duration of the movie.

2. Make a movie in which the Bond girl is the villain, and not just the villain's henchman or victim.  A woman who uses his sex addiction against him would be a nice touch.

3. Make a period film, or a film that takes place in several time periods, perhaps involving a secondary character who knows or is known to Bond.  Litter this film with trivia concerning previous films.

4. Hire Idris Elba as the next 007 whenever Daniel Craig decides he's had enough.

5. Make a more controversial Bond film.  Something that gets people riled up.  Having Russians, North Koreans, random terrorists, and rich people as the villains is a bit too convenient.  What about a Bond film set in Tibet?  Or Xinjiang?  Or Iraq?

6. CIA agent Felix Leiter appears in many of the Bond films.  What about a movie in which they were working against each other?  With their respective countries on opposite sides of an international dispute?

7. Make a movie in which Bollywood icon Sharukh Khan is the villain.  Of course given India's (long) history of film censorship, setting such a film in India would be a problem, but there might be ways to work around that.

8. For that matter, Laurence Fishburne would also be a great Bond villain.  Or maybe he could play the version of Felix Leiter discussed in #6 above.

Other Bond Entries:

Bond: The 1960s
Bond: The 1970s
Bond: The 1980s
Bond: The 1990s
Bond: 2002 to the Present

2015年11月23日 星期一

Marvel's Jessica Jones


There goes my weekend!  I spent about 11 hours last Saturday and Sunday watching Jessica Jones on my computer.  As you may know, I was a big fan of the Netflix Daredevil show, and I was hoping Jessica Jones would be just as good.

Like Daredevil, the first season of Jessica Jones is 13 episodes long, and each episode takes up 50 minutes.  As is to be expected, I remember the episodes near the beginning and end much better than the ones near the middle, and certain things that I liked or didn't like about those middle episodes may have escaped my memory.  I was up until midnight last night watching the show, and parts of it are indeed a blur.

Given the length of a TV season, I also find it hard to discuss Jessica Jones on its own merits.  Instead, I find it easier to compare it to Daredevil, which is/was most people's introduction to Jessica Jones anyway.


The Hero/Heroine

I think Matt Murdock was a far more interesting protagonist than Jessica Jones.  His character was more clearly drawn, and the moral ambiguities inherent in his character were more compelling.  The lawyer/vigilante aspects of Daredevil were one of the strengths of the show, while Jessica's self-esteem issues and post-traumatic stress disorder sometimes make for a convoluted mess.  I think the damage the Purple Man inflicted on her could have either been explained better, or was overemphasized.  At times it seemed like her psychological damage would have had a paralyzing effect on her, rather than the opposite.

One of the problems with Jessica Jones is also the use of her powers.  In the context of the show, Jessica rarely needs to use her powers, and the moments in which she does are often jarring, and brought me out of the moment.  Contrast this with Daredevil, in which his powers are really part of the character, and essential to the situations in which he finds himself.  When all is said and done, Jessica Jones didn't need superpowers, and giving them to her seemed like an unnecessary distraction.

I will say that Jessica's relationship with Luke Cage was one of the strengths of her show.  I think if they had just put more of this into the series it would have been much better.


The Bad Guy

I loved Vincent D'Onofrio's portrayal of Kingpin, but David Tennant is so much better as Killgrave.  Yes, his character seems a bit inconsistent by the last few episodes, but this is nothing compared to the stuttering indecision that the Kingpin experiences toward the end of Daredevil's first season.  In Killgrave we have a deeply threatening villain with serious mental and emotional problems.  In the Kingpin we have a threat that doesn't quite pan out.

Watching Jessica Jones, I often found myself wondering what an interaction between Tennant's Purple Man and D'Onofrio's Kingpin might look like.  It would have been great to see them in a scene together.


Supporting Cast

Both Luke Cage and Carrie-Anne Moss's character Hogarth are more interesting than any of the supporting characters in Daredevil.  Luke Cage is an enthralling addition to the Marvel Cinematic/TV Universe, and I'm looking forward to his show next year.  Hogarth might have been my favorite thing about Jessica Jones, and when she disappears for a few episodes toward the end of the season I found myself wondering where she went, and what she was doing.  I really hope she shows up again in Luke Cage's show.

The guy who plays Foggy Nelson (can't remember his name) on Daredevil is great, but his character is a bit slow on the uptake.  Probably the best of Daredevil's supporting characters is the Kingpin's girlfriend Vanessa, but she was underused in that show.  The Russian gangsters were also excellent.


Plot

This is the part of Jessica Jones that truly outshines Daredevil.  Daredevil was fu*&ing AMAZING for the first few episodes, but seemed to peter out near the end.  His costume was a disappointment, and the whole battle between him and the Kingpin seemed both forced and rushed.  A lot of the drama surrounding Matt's true identity dragged on, as did Matt's Catholic hand-wringing and discussion of "what the right thing to do" might be.

Jessica Jones ties together much better, even if the character's actions don't always make the most sense.  I think the episode where she goes to live with Killgrave was a misstep, but after this detour the series finds a firmer footing.  Like Daredevil, the climax of the show isn't quite as BIG as you hope it will be, but it's still a more definite conclusion than what they did in Daredevil.


Annoying Characters

In Daredevil it was the Kingpin's accountant, and by the end of that series it was Deborah Ann Woll's character.  In Jessica Jones it was her neighbor the fraternal twin and Simpson, the cop.  Neither the accountant nor Deborah Ann Woll's character were even half as annoying as the twin and the cop, so there's a point for Daredevil.


Fight!

One of the highlights of Daredevil is the fight scenes.  This is in keeping with the character.  Jessica Jones isn't really a fight-related character, so it's not fair to compare the two shows from an action perspective.  Whereas Daredevil is all about kicking ass and setting a tone, Jessica Jones is about setting a tone... and occasionally kicking ass.

Even so, there's a good fight scene between Jessica and Luke Cage near the end of the series.  It's done well, but it's nothing like that part in Daredevil where he rescues the child from the Russian gangsters.  Now THAT fight was epic!


Overall

I think that taken as a series, Jessica Jones is the obvious winner.  This might not be fair to Daredevil, since that show was first and thus offered a template for Jessica Jones to build upon.  Just the same, Jessica Jones has a better bad guy, a better plot, and a better supporting cast.  It's definitely not as re-watchable as Daredevil, which is more of a straight crime/action drama, but it is far more memorable.  I'm hoping that elements of Jessica Jones show up again in Luke Cage - a proposition that seems likely.

As for Daredevil, season two is also on the way next year.  It will be interesting to see what that show makes of The Punisher, and also how the Kingpin continues to cause trouble after his incarceration at the end of season one.


A Trivia Question

What celebrated 80s sex symbol makes several appearances in Jessica Jones?  Clue: "Joel, every now and then say 'What the fuck.'  If you can't say it, you can't do it!"